In 2020 UAD need to realise they will fall out of business in the next 5 years if they don't open their system up to run on the end users CPU's!!!! Not to mention the fact that I bought this and then they release an upgraded version which has a more usable interface that should have been there from the start and then they ask for more money to upgrade!! I've gone back to using Logic Pro's stock autotune. I now have an iMac Pro and can run 500 plugins from other manufacturers with ease. I could have just spent more on the computer in the first place. If youre an actual engineer with a studio and you know how to use. All of that cost about £3k, and then UAD want a load of cash per plugin. Antares should really consider a bundle of both Auto-Tune Pro and their UAD plugin. Antares AutoTune Crack can fix a place to keep track of the timber music, you can also apply the Flex Tune Pitch, correction option to remind you Best Vst. Note that I have 2 x Quad UAD-2 Satellites and an Apollo 8. A typical song has about 10-50 vocal tracks and if you try to load this up it just fills the DSP CPU's at about 20 instances. Personally I use UAD auto tune real time and UAD auto tune real time advanced - when I don’t have the Apollo I use EFX+. But was just wondering if anyone had any experience with both of them. I’ve heard from a few people it has a cleaner sound. Okay so the sound does what you would expect, however: I really dislike this plugin, and it's highlighted why I shouldn't have invested in UAD in the first place. Was thinking about upgrading to autotune artist.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |